The History of the 1972 Clean Water Act And How it Became Law

The 1961 Amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments

The Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1961 marked a significant shift in the federal government’s role in combating water pollution. President John F. Kennedy emphasized the urgency of addressing the water pollution problem and the importance of cooperation among various stakeholders.

The 1956 Amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act laid the groundwork for federal involvement in water pollution control. However, disagreements between Congress and President Eisenhower regarding the extent of federal involvement persisted. President Eisenhower believed that water pollution was primarily a state and local concern and vetoed legislation that sought to increase federal construction grants.

With President Kennedy’s election in November 1960, the Executive Branch became more receptive to a larger federal role in water pollution control. In his first address to Congress, President Kennedy emphasized that water pollution had reached alarming proportions and required immediate attention. This stance facilitated the passage of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1961.

The 1961 Amendments brought significant changes to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. Key features of the amendments included:

Transferring administrative authority for the program from the Surgeon General to the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare (HEW).
Expanding federal jurisdiction from strictly interstate waters to navigable or interstate waters in or adjacent to any state or states.
Increasing federal funding for basic and regional research, as well as local, state, and interstate control programs.
Doubling the authorization for the construction grant program.
Increasing the size of grants that could be awarded to a single local project and combined projects.

The 1961 Amendments signified a turning point in the federal government’s role in water pollution control. The amendments broadened the scope of the Act to include almost all of the nation’s waters and expanded federal abatement authority. The Act allowed for federal intervention in intrastate cases upon request of the Governor, acknowledging the national nature of the water pollution problem. Additionally, the amendments enabled municipalities to request federal assistance in combating pollution, albeit with the concurrence of the governor and state water pollution control agency.

The Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1961 reflected the growing recognition of water pollution as a national problem requiring a strong national program. The amendments strengthened the federal government’s role in combating water pollution and set the stage for continued progress in addressing this critical issue.

The Water Quality Act of 1965: A Crucial Step for America’s Waterways

The Water Quality Act of 1965 (WQA) marked a significant step forward in the United States’ efforts to combat water pollution and safeguard the nation’s water resources. The legislation was the result of years of discussions and debates in Congress, with proponents and opponents of water quality standards locked in conflict over the proper course of action.

Prior to the WQA, the federal government had made several attempts to address water pollution, beginning with the Water Pollution Control Act in 1948. Despite these efforts, water quality remained a pressing issue across the country. In 1963, Congress initiated hearings to identify barriers to improving pollution control, with a focus on establishing a more effective federal role in combating water pollution.

The WQA aimed to address these issues through the creation of the Federal Water Pollution Control Administration (FWPCA) within the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (HEW). The new agency would consolidate and administer the growing federal program for water quality improvement. Additionally, the WQA called for the establishment of national water quality standards, which would include both receiving water (ambient) standards and discharge (effluent) standards for all interstate and navigable waters.

The debates around water quality standards were intense, with the House of Representatives and the Senate initially unable to reach a compromise. However, following extensive public hearings and mounting public interest, the conference committee reached a compromise in September 1965, which required water quality standards only for receiving waters. The more contentious effluent standards would be left for future legislation.

President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the WQA into law on October 2, 1965, recognizing the legislation as a proud beginning for the United States in its fight against water pollution. He emphasized the need for joint federal, state, and local action in addressing the issue and acknowledged that further, bolder legislation would be required in the years ahead.

The WQA represented a significant milestone in the evolution of water quality policy in the United States, providing a foundation for future legislation and initiatives. The 1972 Clean Water Act aimed to restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the nation’s waters, while the 1974 Safe Drinking Water Act established standards for contaminants and requirements for municipal drinking water treatment systems.

Amendments to the Clean Water Act in 1987, also referred to as the Water Quality Act, strengthened the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) mandate to control runoff, with a particular focus on the Chesapeake Bay and the Great Lakes. Furthermore, revisions in 1995 and 1996 aimed to provide states with greater latitude in determining water quality within their jurisdictions and harmonize the Safe and Clean Drinking Water Acts.

The Water Quality Act of 1965 marked a crucial step in America’s journey toward safeguarding its water resources. The legislation laid the groundwork for a series of subsequent initiatives, ensuring that the nation’s rivers, lakes, and streams would be protected for generations to come.

Navigating Reforms and Standards: The Path to the 1972 Clean Water Act

The 1972 Clean Water Act (CWA) was the result of a tumultuous decade in the United States, marked by significant changes in the legal system, the enactment of major environmental statutes, and the rise of environmental advocacy groups. One key development was the reassignment of responsibility for the Federal Water Pollution Control Administration (FWPCA) from the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (HEW) to the Department of the Interior. Interior Secretary Stewart Udall successfully convinced Congress that the move would lead to more aggressive efforts to clean up the nation’s waterways.

To demonstrate this commitment, Udall issued guidelines for states to establish water quality standards as mandated by the 1965 Water Quality Act (WQA). The guidelines required states to designate uses for regulated waters, determine the necessary water quality, and create implementation plans to achieve and maintain these standards. Despite initial variations in state responses, all states eventually submitted proposed standards to the FWPCA. However, most state submissions had deficiencies, leading to protracted negotiations between federal and state officials. By 1970, all state standards received preliminary approval, with only twenty states obtaining full federal approval.

The 1966 Amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act

In 1966, President Johnson responded to a report from his Science Advisory Committee recommending increased federal support for water pollution control. In his February 1966 message to Congress on environmental quality, the President outlined a new initiative backed by the White House. Legislation introduced in both houses of Congress, based on the President’s plan, had three main objectives: (1) create and empower regional control agencies; (2) adopt a “One Shot” policy for grants to localities, requiring recipients to prove that future needs could be met with local funds; and (3) strengthen federal enforcement powers in several important ways.

Senator Muskie, proceeding independently, introduced proposals that significantly differed from the President’s “One Shot” idea. Muskie’s subcommittee had been conducting hearings across the country for three years, and the results were released in a short report called “Steps to Clean Water.” The Muskie proposal was based on the subcommittee’s finding that the largest obstacle to improving the nation’s water quality was the massive backlog in funding needed to upgrade municipal waste treatment facilities. To address this issue, Muskie proposed a massive increase in funding for construction grants to municipalities and a package of technical changes to expedite federal funding for local wastewater treatment facilities.

At the Senate hearings, the “One Shot” approach was widely criticized, and Muskie’s substantial increases in construction grant funding were generally praised. The proposed legislation adopted Muskie’s funding approach, scaled down the President’s river basin approach, and made only modest changes to enforcement efforts. The Muskie bill passed the Senate with a minor amendment to authorize more support for training technical personnel.

In the House, the bill closely paralleled the Senate bill because Representative Blatnik did not propose an alternative. However, the House bill reduced the funding authority by about forty percent. The House passed its bill, and a week later, a conference committee reported a final bill that quickly passed both houses and was signed into law by President Johnson on November 3, 1966.

The Clean Water Restoration Act of 1966 amended the Federal Water Pollution Control Act in various ways, but the key provisions primarily involved financing to accelerate states’ abilities to implement new water quality standards. The 1966 Act authorized significant increases in the federal construction grant program, removed any dollar ceiling on individual grants, expanded funding for basic research and basin-wide studies, extended federal enforcement jurisdiction to international boundary waters, and transferred responsibility for administrating the Oil Pollution Act to the Secretary of the Interior.

Revitalization of the Refuse Act: U.S. v. Standard Oil and Its Impact on Water Pollution Regulation

In 1966, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in United States v. Standard Oil Co. that the 1899 Refuse Act granted the Corps authority to regulate all forms of discharges into navigable waters, irrespective of whether they impeded navigation. The Court’s reinterpretation of the Act had significant implications for federal water pollution regulation and enforcement.

The case involved an accidental gasoline spill into a Florida river. The District Court initially dismissed the indictment, arguing that “refuse matter” did not include commercially valuable material. However, the Supreme Court reversed this decision, concluding that the term “refuse” encompassed all foreign substances and pollutants, except those explicitly excluded, such as flows from municipal sanitary sewers and storm sewers.

The Court referred to the legislative history of the Rivers and Harbors Act and its antecedent laws, which made no distinction between valuable and valueless substances. They emphasized that the Act aimed to address both obstacles that impeded navigation and pollution, including various enumerated substances, some of which may have had commercial or industrial value before being discharged.

This reinterpretation of the 1899 Refuse Act empowered the Corps to regulate a wide range of discharges into navigable waters, including those from industrial sources. The ruling went largely unnoticed for four years but gained attention in 1970, with significant implications for the development of the 1972 Clean Water Act.

The revitalization of the Refuse Act proved to be a turning point in the fight against water pollution. By interpreting the Act more broadly, the Court enabled the Corps to provide a stronger foundation for federal regulation and enforcement, paving the way for more robust water pollution control policies. In response to the Court’s decision, environmental protection advocates and policymakers began to explore ways to leverage the Refuse Act’s expanded scope to achieve more significant reductions in water pollution. As a result, the stage was set for the development of the 1972 Clean Water Act, which would build upon the regulatory momentum created by the Court’s ruling and the 1966 amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act.

In summary, the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Standard Oil Co. marked a crucial turning point in water pollution regulation, as it expanded the Corps’ authority to regulate various discharges into navigable waters. This reinterpretation of the Refuse Act laid the groundwork for stronger federal regulation and enforcement, ultimately contributing to the development of the 1972 Clean Water Act.

Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4

References: